Brackenridge Park Master Plan: More People, Fewer Cars

Print Share on LinkedIn Comments More
North End History and Walking Area. Courtesy of Brackenridge Park Conservancy.

Rendering of the North End History and Walking Area, proposed by the Brackenridge Park Master Plan. Courtesy of Brackenridge Park Conservancy.

More green space and more people. Fewer parking lots and less cars. A 10-acre Grand Lawn would become the urban core’s new outdoor gathering place. The park’s many disconnected cultural and recreational destinations would be connected by new walking and bike paths with native landscaping replacing invasive species. An unsightly concrete drainage ditch would become a meandering creek and linear park running from the Witte Museum all the way to U.S. 281.

The Brackenridge Park Master Plan draft now awaiting City Council review, revision, and its authors hope, approval and 2017 bond funding, is a far-reaching, ambitious blueprint for breathing new life into San Antonio’s historic urban park. Early reviews of the draft master plan by the 20 stakeholders located in or along the park and on Broadway are overwhelmingly positive. A few interviewed for this story expressed optimism that all the pieces are falling into place for the City of San Antonio to oversee a dramatic transformation of Brackenridge Park and Broadway from Hildebrand Avenue to Houston Street.

Click here to download the master plan.

A decision to implement the master plan and a privately-funded parallel plan to redesign Broadway into a destination boulevard would represent an unprecedented investment in place making by the City, and would be the strongest effort yet to spark the kind of urban evolution here that many civic and business leaders believe is needed to put San Antonio on a more competitive footing with other leading U.S. cities.

James Gray.

James W. Gray Jr.

“More people, fewer cars, that has been our mantra,” said Rialto Studio Principal and Landscape Architect James W. Gray, Jr., the prime consultant who directed the team that produced the master plan, a project that began more than one year ago when the City issued an RFQ. “We don’t want to change the way people have historically used the park, except for all the vehicles and traffic. Only about 30% of the entire area of Brackenridge Park is available for public use, and a good piece of that space is taken up by streets and parking.

“The notion is that the more we can reduce traffic and parking, the more green space we will have available for public use,” Gray said.

In addition to Rialto Studio, the project team included two other local firms with a strong record of historical preservation and work in the city’s urban core: Ford, Powell & Carson, led by Principal and Architect John Mize, and Alamo Architects, led by principal and Architect Irby Hightower. Architect Jay Loudon, who left Ford, Powell & Carson to open his own firm, work5hop, also is on the team. To review a complete list of all the team consultants, click here.

The first draft of the master plan still lacks an executive summary, a chronology for implementation,  and cost estimates for individual projects.

“Our plan is broken into short-term and long-term components, but we haven’t really sorted out which components are on which list,” Gray said. “Our next step is to engage the public at a public meeting scheduled for April 26. We’ve met with city staff and Council to get their high level approval, and we held a primary stakeholder meeting with the 20 groups most affected and the Brackenridge Park Conservancy in late March. We’ve gained the support of these groups, and are very optimistic at this juncture.”

AGCM, a Corpus Christi-based construction management and estimating firm with an office here, is working on cost estimates.

“We’ve tossed around a lot of numbers, nothing firm, but we are using $150 million for the likely cost of doing everything,” Gray said.

Lynn Bobbitt, executive director of the Brackenridge Park Conservancy, praised the plan and the growing commitment to undertake the park’s restoration. Any major restoration effort funded by city bond money presumably would have to include significant private funds and philanthropic contributions raised by the conservancy.

Brackenridge Park Conservancy Executive Director Lynn Bobbitt. Photo by Scott Ball.

Brackenridge Park Conservancy Executive Director Lynn Bobbitt. Photo by Scott Ball.

“The park is one of those treasures along the river, much-loved, its potential is yet to be realized,” Bobbitt said. “We have the opportunity to create a vision for transforming the park into a world-class urban amenity on par with parks being built in Houston, Dallas, across the country, and around the world. We have an exciting window of opportunity to move the park to the top of the list for government funding — making it a citywide 2017 bond project.

“This is a plan to protect the regional, historic park from future encroachment for private development once and for all, and to embrace recommendations that will improve the visitor experience, and connect all of us to nature and the outdoors. The community should embrace the space as an oasis from the hustle and bustle of everyday activities. That was Col. Brackenridge’s intent with his bequest in 1899. The issues and opportunities are now laid out for discussion and continued vetting. The transformation will take strong public and private partnerships to become reality.”

The master plan contains a significant number of proposed changes that would, indeed, transform Brackenridge Park.

Heart of the Park and Grand Lawn

“For the first time, Brackenridge Park will have a grand public space at its heart,” the plan states.

The plan calls for the creation of a 10-acre Grand Lawn with an adjacent new playground that would require removal of the San Antonio zoo’s large surface parking lot on Tuleta Drive. The Train Station Cafe would be relocated closer to the Cypress Pavilion. The Martinez Softball Field would be moved to share space with the golf driving range. The First Tee facility would not be affected initially by creation of the Great Lawn.

ScottBall_Brackenridge_Master_Plan_Park_4-12-2016-15

An open field in Brackenridge Park. Photo by Scott Ball

“Every great park has a great lawn, a great gathering space,” Gray said. “If we have our way, it will be a full 10 acres, which is the same size as the Sheep Meadow in Central Park.”

The Grand Lawn would be seeded with a hybrid turf resistant to vehicle traffic so it can be used for overflow parking on major event days. The same turf was used around Mission San Juan where Mission Drive and Mission Parkway meet to accommodate overflow parking on big event occasions there.

The expanse of green space created for the Grand Lawn along Tuleta Drive would be complimented by permanent closure to vehicle traffic of the Hildebrand Avenue entrance to the park and the creation of the North End History & Walking Area. This would require removal of all the blacktop along the entrance roadway, around the Donkey Barn, and near the San Antonio River, all of which would be replaced with native landscaping and walking paths.

“The Hildebrand Avenue entrance is in very close proximity to cultural resources on the river that have been unearthed in the last few months by archeologists,” Gray said. “Vehicle traffic is incompatible with restoration and preservation of this complex site, which demonstrates a historical chronology of development of that system.”

North St. Mary’s Street would be closed from Koehler Park gates north to the proposed new zoo bus drop-off and turnaround near the zoo entrance, reducing cut-through traffic and making the area safer for pedestrians and children.

The area would become a pedestrian’s respite from surface street traffic, and could include the reopening of the Lambert Beach swimming hole. Several historic structures would be restored and become attractions: Pump House No. 1, representing the city’s first waterworks established by George Brackenridge; the Rodriguez Bridge, the now-buried 200-year-old Spanish colonial Upper Labor and Alamo Dams, the Bridge to Miraflores and Miraflores Park itself. The park is a now unused 15-acre expanse created by Dr. Aureliano Urrutia, who lived on the site from 1925-1950, and installed gardens and sculpture that reminded him of his native Xochimilco Gardens, now part of the UNESCO World Heritage site that includes the historic center of Mexico City.

A separate master plan exists for the restoration of Miraflores, and the San Antonio Zoo is completing its own master plan.

An all-access third bridge would be constructed between the two existing bridges. The master plan cites various opportunities to make the park more accessible to individuals with disabilities.

Parking Garages

The master plan calls for construction of three new public-private parking garages on the park’s perimeter, none on actual parkland. This would greatly reduce traffic in the park itself and bring to a close efforts by the University of Incarnate word to acquire any public lands in the historic park as well as the practice of students using the park’s Hildebrand Avenue entrance to leave their vehicles while they attend classes or events on campus.

Gray said it will take between 2,000 and 2,500 new parking spaces in multistory garages to relieve traffic congestion in Brackenridge and end the practice of UIW students and those attending district football games and other events at nearby Alamo Stadium from using the park as a parking lot.

One of those would be the Tuleta Parking Garage, a 600-space facility jointly operated by the San Antonio Independent School District and the San Antonio Zoo and located on a surface parking lot now owned by the district on the edge of the park east of  U.S. 281 along Tuleta Drive just west of the Zoo. Vehicles would exit 281 at Hildebrand to enter the garage, an easy walk to the stadium, zoo, Sunken Garden Theater and Japanese Tea Garden and the northern perimeter of the park, which the plan targets for significant green space expansion.

The land (parking lot) between the Alamo Stadium (right) and San Antonio Pets Alive (left) owned by SAISD on Tuleta Drive across from the San Antonio Zoo. Image courtesy of the San Antonio Zoo.

The land (parking lot) between the Alamo Stadium (right) and San Antonio Pets Alive (left) owned by SAISD on Tuleta Drive across from the San Antonio Zoo. Image courtesy of the San Antonio Zoo.

(Read More: SAISD Board and San Antonio Zoo Reach Agreement)

The draft plan suggests the City consider funding a second public-private  parking garage that would be located just outside the park’s northern corner near Hildebrand and Broadway, east of Miraflores on private property. The facility would require UIW’s financial participation, would relieve on-campus traffic congestion and provide an off-campus parking solution that would take UIW student vehicles out of the park. Park users also would be able to park in this facility and walk to the nearby archeological sites and historic locks and dams on the San Antonio River that would be restored under the plan.

A third multistory parking garage, Gray said, would require the City to donate the right-of-way on Margaret Street off Broadway next to the DoSeum, which would require financial participation by the children’s museum.

“One of the central notions in the master plan is moving parking to the edges of the park, which makes sense, so if we are going to take that step now, let’s do it right. There might not be an opportunity to include a parking garage in another bond,” Gray said. “We don’t have an exact number, but we probably want parking in the 2,000 to 2,500 range when you include the Zoo, the DoSeum, the Witte. The three new garages would provide space for 1,800 cars to be parked within walking distance of the Sunken Gardens.”

Wilderness Area

This area of the park will be preserved and enhanced by eventual removal of roadways that will be replaced with pedestrian and bicycle pathways, management of invasive species, and a major restoration of the Catalpa-Pershing Channel into what the plan calls a “more natural waterway.” The unsightly concrete channel  serves as a barrier between Avenue B and various tenants, and is built over significant archeological sites where indigenous occupation and activity has been dated to the early Clovis culture, to 11,000 B.C.  The channel does more to disconnect Brackenridge park from Broadway than any other manmade feature.

“With thoughtful restoration, however, it will be a unifying element which creates important new connections from the Broadway corridor to paths in the park,” the report notes. “Its restoration also will be a driving force for development around the park, as what was before an ugly drainage ditch will become a uniquely enjoyable waterway, with path connections both to the park and to Pearl and downtown San Antonio.”

Long term, the master plan proposed closing Read Oak and Brackenridge Drive to vehicle traffic.

The plan also calls for acquisition of private property located between the park and Broadway to create at least two more pedestrian corridors from the street to the park with wide paths, good landscaping and lighting, use of architectural elements and public art to make the connections more desirable. Avenue B traffic northbound from Mulberry Avenue would become one way northbound to Brackenridge Drive and the Witte Museum.

Sunken Garden Theater

Supporters have long lamented the diminished use and shabby conditions of the Sunken Garden Theater, an open-air amphitheater carved out of the limestone quarry that holds 4,800 people and is located off Tuleta Drive adjacent to the Japanese Tea Garden. Renovation of the Sunken Garden into a state-of-the-art concert and events venue was estimated to cost $15-20 million, but was excluded from the 2012 bond. San Antonio has long been seen as a city with a dearth of destination music venues, although Sunken Garden aficionados think the city has a potentially iconic destination that would attract major acts and sold-out houses if it were brought up to standards for both performers and concert-goers.

“The first heyday of the Sunken Garden Theater is past, but its second – and more durable – lies ahead,” the report states. “The close proximity of the Grand Lawn creates opportunities for synergistic, multi-stage events for the first time in the park’s history.”

Sunken Garden Theater, for those who have never been, will play host to a Taste of New Orleans April 15-17 during Fiesta.

Other Highlights

Brackenridge Park Golf Course would remain untouched, but its rundown clubhouse and maintenance facilities would be slated for renovations and upgrades. The Lions Field is an important hub for senior citizens programs and and the children’s playground is one of the most heavily used facilities in the city. The DoSeum is drawing huge crowds of families and creating safer connections between the DoSeum and the park remains a priority.

The relatively undisturbed property between Avenue A and the San Antonio River would be enhanced with river bank stabilization measures to include native plantings replacing invasive species. Multiple unfunded projects along the Park Reach of the San Antonio River would be completed under the plan. Asphalt on Avenue A would be removed and vehicle traffic would be eliminated.

The Brackenridge Park Master Plan Presentation will take place  Tuesday, April 26, 5:30-7:30 p.m. at Brackenridge Park.

 

https://rivardreport.wildapricot.org

 

Top Image: An ampitheater serves as a centerpiece for the history and walking area in Brackenridge Park’s north end.  Courtesy of Brackenridge Park Conservancy. 

Related Stories:

Hundreds Convene at Pearl to Build a Better Broadway

Leading with Landscape: Redefining ‘Houstonization’

VIA Board Approves Downtown Route Changes for June

Easter Campers Leave Piles of Trash in Brackenridge Park — Again

Brackenridge Park: San Antonio’s Neglected Crown Jewel

33 thoughts on “Brackenridge Park Master Plan: More People, Fewer Cars

  1. The importance of this cannot be overstated. Great cities have great parks. Brackenridge and Civic Park as well should both get the strong municipal financial support they need to reach fruition. Let’s not be penny wise and pound foolish, this is an investment that will benefit generations to come.

  2. Where will all the citizens park? I’m all for this, but we can’t forget that this city is a drive and park city. In order for all citizens to enjoy these improvements, that we all pay for, we should make sure all of us can enjoy them.

    Or are we intentionally removing parking, thereby removing the people that we don’t want there?

    • I concur Vanessa. The Private/public parking garage concept says to me, they will not be free. Colonel Brackenridge stipulated that the park would always be free. Paying for parking will limit a lot of folks. It will also limit some elderly folks that are not very mobile. I know a lot of senior citizens that “don’t want to be a hassle”. If you have to park in a garage, and wheel them out in a chair, some will not go. If they can park, and make it to a picnic area with a cane, they will go.
      Compromise is possible. I just believe we should proceed very carefully.

  3. Like this idea S opposed to another
    Sports venue; think
    Of the local families
    Who would benefit
    Instead of the fewer
    Folks able to afford
    Ticket prices to yet
    Another sports related project !!!!
    This could be done in phases; think longevity❗️

  4. Very, very nicely done, conceptually. I really like the drive to increase parking but move it offsite, which’ll help alleviate parking issues not only in the park but in adjacent areas.

    This would be a much better use of $75m in bond funds than a downtown stadium.

    Is there a link to the master plan itself? All the links to the master plan in the article currently point to the consultant list.

  5. I spent a couple hours at Brackenridge Park last Friday evening and was amazed by how many people were there: young people pushing strollers, older couples strolling the trails holding hands, teenagers riding bikes, and groups of all sizes having picnics and parties. It was clean, safe, and beautiful. I’m all in favor of taking something really good and making it even better.

  6. Or are we intentionally removing parking, thereby removing the people that we don’t want there?

    YES! This is the best part about this whole thing.

  7. please add a running trail – think Memorial Park in Houston, Katy Trail in Dallas, or Lady Bird Trail in Austin, 1.5M people visit the Lady Bird Trail every year, there is a building dedicated just to runners in Memorial Park, Katy trail raises $1M a year through private donations to keep the trail in peak conditions – also add WiFi at certain locations

  8. One of your links is broken, when you click to download the master plan, it just downloads the list of consultants.

  9. In a car-centric city, it’s difficult to imagine that this “new” version of Brackenridge Park will be successful. I will state that this is one of my favorite parks due to the fact that the walking trails and trees there provide a wonderful canopy from the elements (like the sun and rain). Traditionally, I’m against parking garages. They are ugly and ruin the landscape. However, I will keep an open mind as the master plan comes forward. But still – as previous comments have indicated – in removing the streets and parking that are already in place – this MAY improve access but will also restrict it. And – I can’t help but feel this grand master plan may be in response to all those that dislike the use of the park for things like “Easter” weekend and “Sunday” motorcycle and custom car meet-ups. Part of living in the urban core is sharing your space with every individual – not just your local Alamo Heights neighbors (that may have had the luxury of biking to the park).

    I would hope that:
    1) No walking trails or nature trails are removed from this great outdoor space.
    2) The wonderful trees that provide a terrific canopy from the sun are protected from remodeling.
    3) Find other solutions away from ugly parking garages. Parking garages are not progressive – just simple and quick ways to build parking.
    4) When removing streets & roadways – I hope that those with walking disabilities will truly be considered. Right now, it’s an easy route to drive my mother to the center of the park where the playground is located. She can easily watch her grandchildren play on the playground. I hope that these type of interactions are truly considered a priority by park designers.

    • Kay, I can see where some parking garages are ugly, but there are some very nice looking ones, including the one next to the Witte and the one at the Pearl (my two favorites).

      And I have to say that parking garages are indeed progressive and environmentally friendly – a 600-car parking garage uses a fraction of land compared to 600 surface spaces! Think of the trees, green space and amenities that would be better suited to that land, not to mention the lack of permeability and the heat-island effect of acres of parking lots. I’m roasting just thinking about it!

  10. I can not say enough how truly beautiful and thoughtful this plan is!!!!! What an amazing accomplishment by this team. The connection from the Pearl area to the Park is a MUST, and I’m so thankful that the design team saw this as a great opportunity. I would love to ride my bike straight up to the park with minimal street riding.

    The Sunken Gardens theater is a classic example of a San Antonio gem that is not being utilized to its potential. It is, hands down, one of the coolest venues I’ve ever seen. The only concert I’ve ever been to there was Ryan Bingham, and it was one of the best concerts I’ve ever attended. The city could raise some serious dough through aggressively marketing it as a concert venue. Glad the designers are going to give it the love it deserves.

    One thought–why doesn’t SAWS allow after hours and weekend use of its parking garage on Mulberry? I’ve always thought that was strange that a city-owned utility company did not offer that up, or try to monetize their garage for park use, given its proximity. The area where the shot put field and such is currently located could possibly be connected to the SAWS buildings…

  11. Not to hijack the conversation here, but no one has pointed out the obvious: James Gray’s mullet is the most perfect mullet in the mullet-growing history of the world. It should be enshrined in a museum. How is no one else talking about this?

  12. I hold a meditation group occasionally at the Japanese Tea Garden and would love larger space for gatherings. Check out my facebook page under “Pockets of Light San Antonio” if anyone would like to attend, its free. I post all kinds of useful information there and the meditation group meetup sometimes changes to Denman Estate park or the Judson nature trails for a walking meditation. We meet every Sunday at 9:30am.

  13. I think the design team is on the right track. “More people, fewer cars”
    The single worst thing to happen to the area in the past 50 years is the car. We need to get out of the car and into a park. We don’t need park land to store cars.
    Traffic needs to be carefully considered- when Hildebrand was closed the traffic counts on Mulberry must have tripled, and they have not gone back down much. Traffic stacks down St. Marys and onto 281 all the way to the river over spring break.
    We need traffic calming- slower speeds, elimination of cut-throughs into surrounding neighborhoods, and twisty, winding park roads that make people pay attention to their surroundings (Ave. B north of Mulberry).
    We should be allowing the car into a pedestrian environment, and not vice-versa.
    I’m looking forward to seeing the entire document.

  14. I am a native of San Antonio and it is my understanding that Colonel Breckenridge’s wishes (I believe it is in the deed), were that the park will always be free. I have this bad feeling, that the Public/Private parking is NOT going to be free. There is a lot of family tradition associated with this park, with citizens who do not have a lot of expendable income. I agree with Vanessa Martinez Compos; “or are we intentionally removing parking, thereby removing the people we don’t want there?”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *