Commentary: TCEQ, Alamo Area – Friends or Foes on Air Quality?

Print Share on LinkedIn Comments More
A young girl uses her inhaler. Photo courtesy of Moms Clean Air Force of Central TX.

A young girl uses her inhaler. Photo courtesy of Moms Clean Air Force of Central TX.

On a Monday morning last November, the front row parking at Noah’s Event Venue was blocked off for public officials from the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality. Officials drove in from Austin for the Bexar County Air Quality Open House, “a free, educational event (designed) to bring together the public, political leaders, neighborhood associations, nonprofits, businesses, and students to learn about and discuss solutions to air quality issues in the Bexar County area.”

That day, dozens of state employees hosted display tables showcasing tools used by the commission: infrared emission detection cameras and brochures stating that visible industrial flares are “really ok.” Even a mobile air monitoring station stood in the far parking lot.

In an impressive turnout, all the environmental quality commissioners were in attendance. To quote a government employee present, “I’d be lucky to get one of my commissioners to turn out for a workshop.”

The commissioners’ speeches focused heavily on Eagle Ford Shale emissions, specifically on how these have almost nothing to do with local air pollution. This singular focus seemed oddly defensive at an event about Bexar County air quality. In fact, of the seven people who took the stage that day, only one, Councilman Ron Nirenberg (D8), acknowledged ozone pollution was a problem. Only he proposed any ideas for reducing it.

In stark contrast, Commission Toxicology Director Michael Honeycutt, attacked the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s new, more health protective ozone standard, which was lowered to 70 parts per billion last October. Ozone, a colorless, odorless, but highly reactive gas, exacerbates respiratory conditions like asthma and bronchitis in the short term; and in the long term contributes to premature death from decreased lung function. Honeycutt also tried to assure the audience that the health effects of ozone were completely reversible.

Staff from the Alamo Area Council of Governments were present at the event but noticeably absent from being included in the speakers’ slate. The agency is responsible for tabulating local sources of air pollution and modeling regional ozone levels, including recent scientific modeling showing that, on days when the San Antonio region is in violation of air quality standards for ozone, more than two-thirds of the emissions contributing to those ozone levels comes from outside of our region, including emissions from oil and gas activities in the Eagle Ford Shale.

Presentations concluded not with Q&A, as one might expect at an “Open House” event, but an invitation to view displays made by the commission and other local government entities. After that, the event came to an uncomfortable, languishing close.

In conversation afterward, commission emcee Brian Christian listed the many scheduling difficulties for evening meetings: football, church, etc. that would explain the Monday 8 a.m. time slot. His response to why this location had been selected: “Because it was the most convenient for us.” But not perhaps, for Bexar County’s “public, political leaders, neighborhood associations, nonprofits, businesses, and students.”

If the purpose of the event was to ensure the oil and gas industry that the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality would protect them from-ozone related regulations, then I congratulate event organizers on a job well done. The commissioners’ strong words, the participation of dozens of TCEQ staff and the absence of competing voices sent a clear message. However, if the purpose of the event was to bring together varied stakeholders, distinct viewpoints and collectively, “discuss solutions to air quality issues in the Bexar County area,” then the commission has a long way to go.

In all likelihood, the Alamo Area will be in violation of the ozone standard for the period 2014-2016, and the commission will be responsible for helping to develop strategies to minimize ozone pollution in the region. If last fall’s workshop is any indication, locals may find themselves as merely witnesses, not participants in the process. The time for meaningful engagement with the state is now.

 

*Top Image: A young girl uses her inhaler. Photo courtesy of Moms Clean Air Force of Central TX.

Related Stories:

 Clean Air, Clean Technology Take Hold in South Texas

Keep It Clean, San Antonio: Our Air, Our Health

The Greening of San Antonio

San Antonio Launches Clean Air Awareness Efforts

3 thoughts on “Commentary: TCEQ, Alamo Area – Friends or Foes on Air Quality?

  1. TCEQ and AACOG seem to be playing the same game, but from different angles. TCEQ is protecting and AACOG is protecting road building. However, if you look at the SA2020 scorecard, San Antonio has been in violation of the 70 ppb standard since at least 2010, and if you look at earlier reports, San Antonio has exceeded the 70 ppb since at least 1999.

    Table 3.5-6 of the 2004 REVISIONS TO THE STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
    FOR THE CONTROL OF OZONE AIR POLLUTION (https://www.tceq.texas.gov/assets/public/implementation/air/sip/sipdocs/2004-06-SA/SAT_narr_261004.pdf) shows ozone levels that exceed 70 ppb consistently observed.

    I could certainly be misinterpreting this report, but AACOG’s attempt to deflect the current problem to Eagle Ford seems more like an attempt to say we have no local control over the problem. Eagle Ford is a problem, but so is local transportation. AACOG should address Eagle Ford, but they should also address what they can control locally. Stop building roads and highway capacity.

  2. Regulatory capture, the process by which the regulators are “captured” by the industry they are supposed to be regulating. This unhealthy alliance is not just potentially lethal to vulnerable residents, it’s eventually going to backfire on San Antonio, with greater costs for non-attainment and increased public healthcare costs. Yes, there exists both a transportation problem and an Eagle Ford problem–so, please, agencies whose job it is to protect us, DO SOMETHING. This fourth-generation San Antonio, whose emotional ties to the city are profound, can no longer live there, and I write this email from my exile in Rockport. Please DO SOMETHING so I can come home, and so that the figures we’re seeing from the UK, where thousands of people are dying every year from pollution, do not become our reality.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *