Judge Orders Voter ID Fix for Texas House Runoff

Print Share on LinkedIn Comments More

Graphic by Cheryl Gerber, courtesy of The Texas Tribune.

Voters in Bexar County will be the first to cast their ballots under relaxed regulations after a federal appeals court ruled that Texas’ strict voter identification law discriminated against minority voters.

Signing off on a deal struck by Texas and opponents of its embattled law, a federal judge on Saturday gave voters new options for identifying themselves at the polls.

The order from U.S. District Judge Nelva Gonzales Ramos applies only to the special runoff election for Texas House District 120, which includes San Antonio’s Eastside. But it could foreshadow broader efforts to redraw the 2011 Texas law – Senate Bill 14 – to comport with the Voting Rights Act.

Last week, the U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that Texas has violated the law prohibiting racial discrimination in voting, and Ramos is charged with finding remedies ahead of looming elections.

Early voting for the special election began Monday and runs though Friday. Election Day is Aug. 2. Democrat Lou Miller faces Laura Thompson, an Independent.

The original Texas law required citizens to present one of seven forms of identification for their votes to be counted: a state driver’s license or ID card, a concealed handgun license, a U.S. passport, a military ID card, a U.S citizenship certificate with a photo or an Election Identification Certificate.

Under Saturday’s order, would-be voters without such identification may vote provisionally and sign an affidavit attesting to who they are and saying a “reasonable impediment” prevents them from obtaining such identification. The voter may also bring a voter registration card or a utility bill, bank statement, paycheck or other government document showing his or her name.

Those without such documents must write their birth dates on the affidavits, along with the last four digits of their social security numbers.

The provisional ballots must be counted, the order said, “unless there is conclusive evidence that the affiant is not the person in whose name the ballot is cast.”

 

This article originally appeared in The Texas Tribune, a nonpartisan, nonprofit media organization that informs Texans — and engages with them – about public policy, politics, government and statewide issues.

 

https://rivardreport.wildapricot.org

 

Top image: Graphic by Cheryl Gerber, courtesy of The Texas Tribune. 

Related Stories:

After Appeals Court Ruling Against Texas Voter ID Law, Now What?

Texas Voter ID Law Struck Down by Fifth Circuit Appeals Court

Daughter of Segregationist Governor Discusses Race & Voting Rights

Texas Voter ID Law Violates Voting Rights Act, Court Rules

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *