Mayoral Candidates Talk Gentrification with Esperanza

Print Share on LinkedIn Comments More
Theresa Canales moderates the Esperanza Peace & Justice Center's mayoral forum. Photo by Iris Dimmick.

Theresa Canales moderates the Esperanza Peace & Justice Center's mayoral forum. Photo by Iris Dimmick.

There have been dozens of mayoral forums this year, some hosted by organizations with a specific focus, such as transportation or tourism and the hospitality industryThe Rivard Report’s forum at the Pearl last week focused more broadly on a range of urban issues. The Esperanza Peace & Justice Center‘s forum on Saturday afternoon, titled “Gentrification and the Right to Remain,” was the latest single-issue forum.

Esperanza invited the four major candidates – former state Sen. Leticia Van de Putte, former County Commissioner Tommy Adkisson, Mayor Ivy Taylor, and former state Rep. Mike Villarreal – to participate. Four candidates were on stage, but most notably, Taylor was not among them. Due to a schedule conflict, she did not attend. Mayoral candidate Rhett Rosenquest Smith, who lists his occupation as “private security,” took the opportunity, uninvited, to take her seat. He’s one of the many minor candidates on the ballot who are not running traditional campaigns.

Rhett Rosenquest Smith answers a question during the Esperanza Peace & Justice Center's mayoral forum. Photo by Iris Dimmick.

Rhett Rosenquest Smith (right) answers a question during the Esperanza Peace & Justice Center’s mayoral forum. Photo by Iris Dimmick.

The opening questions were about development projects that Esperanza actively opposed and protested: the $75 million multi-family apartment complex that displaced Mission Trails Mobile Home Park residents; the Alamo Beer Company’s new brewery next to the Hays Street Bridge, and the sale and demolition of the Univision building to make way for the $55 million, 350-unit Elan Riverwalk project now under construction.

Interestingly, none of the candidates openly challenged Esperanza’s opposition to the City’s handling of the projects, or its policies that support increased residential density in the urban core and revitalization of the downtown business district and surrounding neighborhoods. Instead the candidates offered ideas for how future development projects can be managed to avoid social conflict and economic displacement, such as increased transparency and more proactive communications with the community.

The candidates also answered various questions – asked by moderator Theresa Canales – that were sent in by community members and the audience, which wrote down questions on cards that were then selected by Esperanza staff.

The strongest words of the evening came in an exchange between Villarreal and Van de Putte, who targeted each other on the handling of state legislation that cleared a path for the Hemisfair Park Area Redevelopment Corporation to move forward without a public vote. Villarreal pushed for language that prohibited or limited hotel development within the park. Van de Putte’s bill that passed the Senate, with strong support from San Antonio-based Zachry Corp., did not include that restriction. The City ultimately added a restriction in the Hemisfair deed that limits hotel development to a boutique hotel with no more than 200 rooms.

“There was an advocate who wanted to build a hotel, a guy named David Zachry,” Villarreal said. The mention of Zachry’s name elicited several hisses in the audience of about 75. “We were able to prevent him from building a new convention center hotel … but only because we had a mayor and council (that supported the deed language).”

Van de Putte turned to her former legislative colleague and raised her voice.

“I posted the bill on a Monday. On Tuesday, our grandson didn’t wake up. He died. And I was not in the Legislature that entire week,” she said. “My Senate colleagues, in an effort to help me, took every single bill that I had in the Senate and passed it to the House – knowing that at least (the bill) could get done.

“I wasn’t even there, I was burying my grandchild,” she continued. “For you to use a personal tragedy and that I was against that … I wasn’t even there.”

Van de Putte’s stance against restricting hotels in Hemisfair Park was clear long before her grandson’s death, Villarreal said after the forum. He was shocked by her emotional response.

“The death of her grandson had nothing to do with her position,” Villarreal said.

The heated words from  the two candidates came as the campaign intensifies in the closing days before early voting commences on April 27 and three weeks before the May 9 election. Both Van de Putte and Villarreal are reaching out to voters with television advertisements, mail-outs, and aggressive social media campaigns.

More forums are on the calendar, even during Fiesta, as candidates enter the home stretch.

Upcoming forums include:

  • Wednesday, April 22, 6p.m.:  Mayoral Candidate Forum on Clean Energy at UTSA
  • Monday, April 27, 7:30 p.m.: Change the Vote, a “discussion on arts as an economic engine to revitalize San Antonio” at the Tobin Center for the Performing Arts.
  • Tuesday, April 28, 6:30 p.m.: The San Antonio LULAC Council in partnership with MOVE San Antonio and the Pride Center of San Antonio will host a forum at the San Antonio Area Foundation.

 

*Featured/top image: Theresa Canales moderates the Esperanza Peace  & Justice Center’s mayoral forum. Photo by Iris Dimmick.

Related Stories:

Watch and Listen to Your Future Mayor at Pints & Politics II

Pints & Politics II: Mayoral Candidates State Their Case at the Pearl Stable

Van de Putte Campaign Cash Transfer Draws Fire at Forum

Cities Watch as Texas Lege Seeks Rideshare Control

Mayoral Candidates Meet Again at Trinity University

5 thoughts on “Mayoral Candidates Talk Gentrification with Esperanza

  1. Shame no one brought up the schizophrenia of the city’s historic preservation policies. It’s relevant considering the ugly battles brewing over gentrification.

    Little secret: if you study the impact statistics of local historic districts, you will discover they cause economic segregation and gentrification, becoming pockets of mostly white affluence in the urban core. Bluntly, rich whites push out the poor black and brown families who have lived in the “historic” homes for generations but cannot afford the higher costs of historic repair/upkeep and the punishing property tax hikes that follow historic designation.

    Additionally, local historic districts freeze density at unacceptably low levels. Not good news for a city dominated by urban sprawl that needs to increase density to make higher caliber mass transit a practical reality.

    And of course INTERIM Mayor Taylor had a convenient “prior engagement.” The last thing she wants is to take fire from a LGBT friendly crowd regarding what happened on her city council watch to the unfortunate residents of the Mission Trails trailer park. She would have been shredded.

    VdP didn’t handle criticism well last night either, using the death of a child to excuse a poor legislative choice was low. I’m surprised Mike didn’t fall out of his chair in shock.

    *Historic is in quotes above because San Antonio’s standards for what is considered historical are ridiculous. Any house over 30 years of age can be rezoned historic. No one notable needs to have been born there, slept there, died there, lunched there.

  2. Van de Putte’s reaction and response are one of the things that scare me about her. She knows you cannot respond to that emotion in a public forum. As Villareal states, her opinion was clear before her tragic event. I hope she finds peace in her tragic loss.

  3. The right to remain is totally up to the owner of property not to sell. Now if county/city/schools want to put a freeze on raising taxes for those that apply and qualify because of years owned. That is something for them to do.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *