Troubled Abengoa Files for Protection from Creditors

Print Share on LinkedIn Comments More
The Abengoa PS20 Solar Power Plant located near Andalusia, Spain. Courtesy photo.

The Abengoa PS20 Solar Power Plant located near Andalusia, Spain. Courtesy photo.

The future of the $3.4 billion Vista Ridge water pipeline project with the City of San Antonio and the San Antonio Water System was put into jeopardy Wednesday when Abengoa Sociedad Anónima (SA), the Spanish renewable energy and engineering conglomerate, filed for protection from its creditors in Madrid.

The filing could lead to what the Wall Street Journal called the “largest bankruptcy in the country’s history.”

City and SAWS officials said the filing would not impact the Vista Ridge project which won approval from City Council in October 2014 and led in part to significant rate hikes approved by City Council earlier this month.

“We made sure through last year’s negotiations that financial protections were built into the Vista Ridge project to insulate SAWS customers from risk,” stated SAWS President and CEO Robert Puente. “The Abengoa Vista Ridge (company) is financially independent and legally separate from the holding company in Spain. That means the San Antonio Vista Ridge project will continue to move forward.”

Abengoa Vista Ridge has invested about $30 million into the project, according to SAWS officials, and therefore has the incentive to follow through on the project.

“Bankruptcy filing of (the) parent company is not projected to have an impact on progress of Vista Ridge project,” Mayor Ivy Taylor stated in a text to the Rivard Report. “SAWS folks have been communicating with Abengoa.”

SAWS customers won’t technically be paying for the project until the deal’s financial close, SAWS officials noted.
“The potential demise of Abengoa is an extreme example of a Spanish company whose debt-fueled expansion during the country’s boom years has handicapped its ambitions for growth today,” the Journal reported.

Bloomberg News reported that Abengoa’s bonds and stocks “tumbled to record lows” in the wake of the news and were suspended from trading on the Madrid Stock Exchange.

Abengoa SA is a global leader in energy production and transmission and water development with major projects underway or on the drawing board throughout Latin America and increasingly in the United States. The Vista Ridge project calls for Abengoa and its Texas-based partner, BlueWater Systems, to construct a 142-mile pipeline from Burleson County to San Antonio for delivery of up to 50,000 acre-feet of water to SAWS starting in 2019 or 2020 and continuing for 30 years with a 30-year renewal option. Vista Ridge, as the Abengoa-BlueWater partnership is known, has contracted with a significant number of landowners in Burleson and Lee counties to pump enough water from the Carrizo-Wilcox Aquifer to service 162,000 households annually.

“I have really enjoyed getting to know the people at Abengoa, but their company is probably going to have to go through a painful restructuring to come out of this situation,” said Ramiro Cavazos, President and CEO of the San Antonio Hispanic Chamber of Commerce. “They’ve been living above their means and they can’t afford those levels of debt. We’ve seen the same thing happen to major American corporations. General Motors had to seek bankruptcy protection and they came out of it much stronger. The same could happen for Abengoa. I’m really pleased at the way SAWS negotiated the Vista Ridge contract to mitigate any exposure that either SAWS of the City otherwise might have had.”

The water from Vista Ridge would increase SAWS’ available water supply by nearly 20%. A much-disputed water report draft prepared for the City of San Antonio this year labeled the Vista Ridge project as “high risk,” a rating that was downgraded to “moderate risk” in the final version of the report. The report also stated that even if San Antonio did not proceed with the Vista Ridge project it would have to secure new water supplies of an equal magnitude to meet the long-terms demands of a population that is expected to grow by 1.1 million people by 2040.

The Wall Street Journal report stated that “the latest round of Abengoa’s negotiations with creditors began after Spanish investment firm Gonvarri Corporación Financiera canceled a plan to inject around €350 million ($372.85 million) into the Seville, Spain-based company, Abengoa said in a regulatory filing on Wednesday.”

 

Editor’s Note: This story has been updated with statements from Mayor Taylor and SAWS officials.

*Top image: The Abengoa PS20 Solar Power Plant located near Andalusia, Spain. Photo courtesy of Abengoa.

RELATED STORIES:

Council Approves New Water Rates, Structure

City Council Poised for Key Vote on Water Rates

Cisneros: City Council Should Approve SAWS Rate Changes

Commentary: Is the Vista Ridge Groundwater Reliable?

Water Report Author Fields Questions From City Council

15 thoughts on “Troubled Abengoa Files for Protection from Creditors

  1. Turbulent times – great article.

    FYI, think it’s Ramiro Cavazos with a “Z” instead of an “S”. Must protect the name! 🙂

  2. The SAWS Board were the decision makers in selecting Abengoa. It would be beneficial for the sake of information and transparency to hear from their Chairman on the vetting process.

  3. Give credit to Mr. Cavazos for sticking to his political friends in city hall despite having information indicating Abengoa was in financial stress, “…but their company is probably going to have to go through a painful restructuring to come out of this situation,” said Ramiro Cavazos, President and CEO of the San Antonio Hispanic Chamber of Commerce.” Also, what does is say about the A&M entity downgrading the Vista Ridge project from a “high” to “medium” risk project? I sure would not ask for their advice on any future water projects.

      • Bob, I have not had the time to read the 784 page agreement in the link you provided. However, I did browse the fact sheet which indicates this project will provide water for 163,000 households. The project costs $3.4B dollars. If you assume each of the 163,000 families will spend $2,500 a year on water those families will have paid for the Vista Ridge project in a little over 8 years. In the meantime the current ratepayers are also paying for the project with the rate increase imposed on them (not sure how much SAWS projects to receive from this rate increase, maybe the $3.4B?). Is SAWS getting paid for the project twice? Also, I have not read anything that said the additional rate increase to fund the project will go away at any time creating an additional revenue source for SAWS indefinitely. Am I missing something? Thanks. Ken

        • Ken, We would have to submit your question to SAWS for a more detailed response, but offhand, I’d say your financial assumptions are off. the average annual SAWS bill for water and wastewater is much lower than your $2.5K number, I believe. Mine certainly is much lower. SAWS also anticipates the approved rates being lower if any of the VR water is sold to other utilities or municipalities. The rate increases, however, are only partially based on the VR water purchase. The EPA mandate to spend $1.1B on wastewater system improvements, and the cost of funding the brackish water desal plant construction through three phases in south Bexar County account for more of the rate increase than the VR water. Finally, if the pipeline gets built, it reverts to SAWS after 30 years with a 30-year option on all the contracted water in Burleson and Lee counties. Does that help? iF you need more we can pose the Q to SAWS for a response. –RR

          • Thanks Bob. I agree I was being generous with the monthly water bill projections. According to the fact sheet only $12 of the rate increase will be needed for the VR project.
            Q: How much will the Vista Ridge Pipeline project cost?
            A: San Antonio boasts the lowest water bill of any major city in
            Texas. It is currently estimated that the average residential
            bill will be approximately $88 in 2020, of which no more than $12
            will be needed to pay for the water provided through this project.
            Most importantly, however, is that San Antonio will only pay for
            water that is delivered. That means any risk to the delivery of
            water falls on the private developer, not on the SAWS ratepayer.

            If you can pose to SAWS the question of how long they will need the $12 rate increase in place to pay for the project, that will be much appreciated. Also, when SAWS says the ratepayer will only pay for the water provided, is that a separate cost to the $3.4B number? In other words, is SAWS committed to paying for the infrastructure and will only pay for water provided? I believe that is the case. If so, there is no risk for paying for water not delivered, but their is a risk SAWS could invest $3.4B dollars and not receive a drop of water if I read the above question and answer correctly. Thanks.

          • Bob, one other question. If you can find out how many residential ratepayers they assume in their projections, that would be helpful info too. Thx

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *