An Entrepreneur’s Take on How to Address Rising Health Care Costs

Print Share on LinkedIn Comments More
Any Lab Test Now Medical Assistant Anna Mendoza performs a blood test paid for by Geekdom Co-Founder Graham Weston for fasting glucose, fasting insulin, an average glucose over 3 months (HbA1c), and a lipid panel in the Duck Hunt Conference Room at Geekdom.

Bonnie Arbittier / Rivard Report

As health care costs continue to rise, employers and employees must navigate the additional expenditures.

By far the biggest issue in the United States is health care. Whatever your cause, you need to help fix health care first.

Two charts make this case hard to refute.

Kaiser Family Foundation analysis of Truven Health Analytics MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters Database, 2005-2015; Bureau of Labor Statistics, Seasonally Adjusted Data from the Current Employment Statistics Survey, 2005-2015 (April to April)

Courtesy / Kaiser Family Foundation

Kaiser Family Foundation analysis of Truven Health Analytics MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters Database, 2005-2015; Bureau of Labor Statistics, Seasonally Adjusted Data from the Current Employment Statistics Survey, 2005-2015 (April to April)

We always hear about wage stagnation, but wages are actually rising – the gains are just getting eaten up in health care benefits, which do not show up as wages. Worker and employer costs are rising rapidly for health benefits. And even when workers end up earning more in spending power, much of it goes to health care in the form of deductibles and other costs.

An entry-level employee in my business ends up having more than a 20 percent cost factor versus salary on health benefits. So if health costs rise 10 percent (not unusual in the last two decades), a 2 percent rise in salary is 100 percent eaten up by health benefits. And, with health care results not increasing, getting ahead in this way really means staying in place.

And our government? Well, they too are swamped covering health care. It is overtaking every other expense with no end in sight. We are headed to upwards of 30 percent of our budget being eaten by health care, and these numbers only include direct health care programs, not the costs eaten up inside other big programs whether the military, research, or education.

CRFB extrapolations

Courtesy / Congressional Budget Office

Source: Congressional Budget Office, CRFB extrapolations

So, people who are working hard and succeeding feel no better off. And the government, which has big problems to solve – education, transportation, R&D, climate – has to give all incremental dollars to health care. If you care about any other program, from social justice to military intervention, you need health care costs to be solved first. There is just not going to be money for your program if we keep on the current track.

Despite facing this reckoning, we are not getting solutions. The left is obsessed with universal coverage. This is a noble end, but like any other new program, we need lower costs to make it viable. The right, well, they are not in the game. Ever since Sarah Palin’s abhorrent (but effective) lie of “death panels” the right has used fear of health care reform as a political weapon.

Costs have to be our obsession. We spend too much – almost 50 percent more than any other country on a per capita basis.

Kaiser Family Foundation analysis of data from OECD (2017), "OECD Health Data: Health expenditure and financing: Health expenditure indicators", OECD Health Statistics (database)

Courtesy / Kaiser Family Foundation

Kaiser Family Foundation analysis of data from OECD (2017), “OECD Health Data: Health expenditure and financing: Health expenditure indicators”, OECD Health Statistics (database)

The only real proposal on the table to lower costs is Medicare for All. Ever since we removed “pre-existing” coverage as a factor in insurance coverage, the real value of insurance companies – assessing risk – has been minimized. Furthermore, Medicare costs are lower on average than private insurance.

But, politically, Medicare for All is not happening. It’s a wholesale overthrow of the current system. It is just not feasible. Our skepticism of government in the U.S. is too strong. Doctors are too powerful. And a unified force of special interests will blunt it. As Uwe Reinhardt pointed out, “Every dollar of waste in the health care system is a dollar of income for some provider.” They won’t give up easily. Not to mention, universal coverage remains the primary benefit of Medicare for All. Solving the cost issues require deeper thinking.

We need a hardcore push to incrementally get the cost curve bending back. The Affordable Care Act actually contemplated some real cost cutting programs – pay for impact, evidence-based payment boards, even the health care mandate – but failed the final bill or have been weakened since passage. The program fell back on dealing with coverage. Costs were for another day. That day must be now.

To get this done, we need fewer grand plans and more small, wonky ideas that chip away at the problem. With small gains, we will end up in a place where bigger decisions can be made. The left and right have many of these ideas that, in isolation, could pass into law. With a laser focus on lowering costs, each could get things done.

Patent reform on drugs, more pay for service, fewer large hospital and drug mergers, tort reform, testing effectiveness standards, provider licensing reform, behavior-based pricing, cross border insurance plans, patient data standards and portability, giving Medicare negotiating powers, doctor-drug incentive reform, advertisement reform, telemedicine regulations, and many more ideas exist – each of which could make a difference. These are unsexy, technical changes. No one can win office on any one of these tactics, but they can on a total commitment to lower costs and tangible plans to get there.

Americans are going to demand progress on health care costs. They are fed up with their income being eaten up and their government held hostage. Each side could deal to get some of their wish list done. But, we need leadership ready to make lower health care costs a priority. If it gets done, our options expand. We can then fight over the money we get back and what to do with it – pay debt, fund schools, expand coverage, massive infrastructure investments. Those are the fun debates. But the health care overhang will haunt us until we turn the cost tide. Let’s see who steps into this debate with real, doable solutions.

5 thoughts on “An Entrepreneur’s Take on How to Address Rising Health Care Costs

  1. I disagree. A bunch of little wonky policy ideas will not solve the healthcare problem. There are two big ideas that will address it however:
    1) Get health insurance out of the workplace. It’s not the job of your job to insure you. And unless healthcare insurance is the core mission of your employer then it is nothing but a distraction.
    2) Profiting off the sick and dying is wrong. People who get rich off needless healthcare markups will not voluntarily go away or cede their riches.
    There is one solution that address both of these big ideas – Medicare for all.

  2. Pravlen, thanks for the comment. I think you identify two good issues and Medicare for all surely solves #1. I think there is a lot more to discuss on #2. I see no real reason to believe #2 is magically solved. Surely defense companies profit even though the government does all the buying. Do you suggest we make the entire value chain public – hospitals, drug companies, doctors?

    If the gov controls the entire system…many big questions will have to be litigated…how much should doctors make? how much care at end of life is fair? if statins are proven ineffective, do we stop giving them? there will be 1000s – and new ones all the time- especially in a time of great change (now!)

    The details really matter. M4A is a great headline and end state, but making it work right and still not crowding out all our other needs is a huge challenge.

  3. Excellent “Big questions” in your last comment. Each could deserve an article.

    I find myself yelling at the TV that the answer is in the middle for almost every issue. Your paragraph on the two parties holding their extreme positions of Universal Care vs Death Panels, again reminds me that the only answer is a 3rd party to bring mediation, and conclusion, to the process.

    Trump is almost 3rd party as not Left and not really Right, but he is not very bright or moral. I wish the drive for change could have materialized as Ross Perot. I know special interests prefer 2-party as it is cheaper and easier to know who to invest in, and so the broke system lives on.

  4. I was somewhat cynical when I read the disclosure comment below this article and while I don’t really care for the carefree tone that can only come from someone without any significant skin in the game (no offense intended Mr Moorman, but you strike me as someone who’s grown up in wealth and remains wealthy and likely have little idea of how ruinous healthcare bills can actually be for some of us – your comment about “fun debates” betrays this), but I do appreciate the bringing of the debate back to the public sphere – where it must remain for our collective good.

    I disagree that Medicare for All isn’t happening, the congressional hearing (loosely) in the issue from the other day tells us that it’s becoming a mainstream idea that will feature prominently in the Democratic Party debates, if not platform, and will become a central policy issue for candidates over the next 2-3 election cycles.

  5. The whole point of the article is the high costs are hurting people – and keeping us from being able to talk about other real investments (yes, I view them as more fun to talk about than paying more for the same outcomes on healthcare). I am pushing for a dedication to solving this issue. Does the fact that I don’t directly struggle with these costs mean I can’t care or comment? You might think I am dismissing your preferred solution, but I am not. I am simply giving my POV on how serious the issues is and how real progress can be made. You are welcome to disagree by questioning my character or persuading with arguments of your own. I wish you chose the latter.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *