City, Tech Leaders Denounce Ballot Props at Tech Bloc Rally

Print Share on LinkedIn Comments More
Mayor Ron Nirenberg speaks to full room about why everyone should go vote "no."

Bonnie Arbittier / Rivard Report

Mayor Ron Nirenberg addresses the crowd at the Tech Bloc Rally at Southerleigh Fine Food and Brewery.

Defeating a trio of City charter amendments is critical to realizing San Antonio’s hope of becoming a world-class city with a thriving tech sector, City and business leaders told a crowd of more than 1,000 people gathered at the Pearl Thursday.

Mayor Ron Nirenberg, State Rep. Diego Bernal (D-San Antonio), and local industry leaders were among the speakers as Tech Bloc hosted a rally at Southerleigh Fine Food & Brewery to encourage its members to vote against the November ballot propositions. True to the descriptor, “Rally to Save Our City,” the speeches became impassioned at times.

“You’re not just going to vote no once,” said David Spencer, a local entrepreneur. “It is no! It is no! It is no! You are not going to ruin what we are building here.”

(From left) Scaleworks General Partner Lew Moorman, Tech Bloc CEO David Heard, State Rep. Diego Bernal (D-San Antonio), Go Vote No Campaign Manager Christian Archer, and Mayor Ron Nirenberg wait to speak on the second floor brewery in Southerleigh Fine Food and Brewery.

Bonnie Arbittier / Rivard Report

(From left) Scaleworks General Partner Lew Moorman, Tech Bloc CEO David Heard, State Rep. Diego Bernal (D-San Antonio), Go Vote No Campaign Manager Christian Archer, Mayor Ron Nirenberg, and entrepreneur Gordon Hartman gather on the second floor of the brewery.

The rally was perhaps the most visible public event as the political fight around the issue becomes increasingly contentious. After years of stalled negotiations and court battles, the San Antonio Professional Firefighters Association led a successful petition to place the referenda on the ballot. Now, the union is leading a campaign for voters to approve the propositions on Nov. 6.

The propositions – labeled A, B, and C on the ballot – would pave the way for voters to potentially make more municipal decisions, limit to eight years the length of time a city manager could serve and cap future city managers’ pay at 10 times that of the lowest-paid City employee, and allow the firefighters union to force the City into binding arbitration on a new labor contract, respectively.

Tech Bloc opposes the propositions because it believes they would weaken the authority of the elected representatives who serve on City Council and give way to special interest groups battling for control of the city. There has also been worry that expanding the referendum process would lower the City’s AAA bond rating, the highest score an entity can attain, and thus raise doubts about the City’s future ability to issue debt. Any hits to the city’s economy would threaten to stall or undo progress San Antonio has made toward becoming a walkable, culture-rich city that appeals to tech talent, Tech Bloc leaders have said.

Councilman Greg Brockhouse (D6) speaks with members of the San Antonio Professional Firefighters Association.

Scott Ball / Rivard Report

Councilman Greg Brockhouse (D6) speaks with members of the San Antonio Professional Firefighters Association.

The issue has thus far elicited a bevy of responses from the community that do not appear to fall along traditional party lines. Conservative Councilman Greg Brockhouse (D6), a former political consultant for the fire and police unions, has endorsed the propositions. The San Antonio Chamber of Commerce is against the ballot items, but the Bexar County Democratic Party is supporting them (although its Chair Monica Alcantara has called for another vote). A group of more than 100 Latina women will hold a press conference Friday to announce their opposition to the propositions. The event will take place at Plaza del Zacate/Milam Park at 11 a.m.

Tech Bloc said this week 1,600 people had registered to attend the event. The advocacy group’s CEO David Heard said the initial ticket allotment started out around 1,000 but was expanded three times to accommodate rising demand.

Southerleigh was the site of the organization’s first rally in May 2015, when the group railed against what it deemed onerous rideshare regulations that caused ride-hailing companies Uber and Lyft to stop operating in the city.

Now a perennial presence at City Hall that helped craft regulations the City Council adopted Thursday for e-scooters, Tech Bloc finds itself in a different position.

A then-candidate for mayor, Nirenberg was among attendees at the first Tech Bloc rally. He credited Tech Bloc with pointing the city in a better direction.

“Your representatives listened,” he said. “It took a little while longer, but eventually we got it right. We welcomed Uber and Lyft to San Antonio.”

Scaleworks General Partner Lew Moorman, whose venture fund includes several software-as-a-service companies in an East Houston Street space, said the forward movement of San Antonio’s burgeoning tech corridor in a once-derelict part of downtown would come to a screeching halt with passage of the ballot propositions.

“This tech ecosystem is just starting,” Moorman said.


6 thoughts on “City, Tech Leaders Denounce Ballot Props at Tech Bloc Rally

  1. Lmao Nirenberg looks like he’s telling a ghost story in that bottom picture. Oh, wait, he is! Because these propositions are TERRIFYING.

  2. Basically what these well to do people are supporting is continued control of San Antonio by the local corporate moguls making huge
    profits off our labor. Continued segregation/unequal public education. Continued gentrification and unaffordable housing.
    Yeah, we’ve been tolerating this for 300 years. I vote Yes!

  3. With the unbelievably bad deal on Alamo Plaza that the city council, and mayor (of course, that means city manager also)are pushing on the citizens in spite of the loud and extended disapproval, a vote on many things by the citizens seems needed at this time.

  4. I like how the writer of this article failed to actually articulate any reasonable belief to oppose the propositions. The bottom line is these propositions move power and decision making back to the people of the city, which is where it should be. The quote “it undermines the city leadership’s authority” is exactly true and is exactly what people want. Politicians have far too much power and decision making authority without consequence. There is valid reason to oppose these propositions, the only argument is “well, it’ll limit our power” and thats exactly what the people want. Limited government = more freedom for the people.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *