Lone Star Rail Briefing Postponed Until 2016

Print Share on LinkedIn Comments More
Council member Rey Saldaña (D5) discusses his his new transportation proposal during City Council "B Session" on Wednesday, Nov. 18, 2015. Photo by Lea Thompson.

Council member Rey Saldaña (D5) discusses his his new transportation proposal during City Council "B Session" on Wednesday, Nov. 18, 2015. Photo by Lea Thompson.

Funding discussions for the multi-billion dollar Lone Star Rail District (LSRD) project were pushed back to 2016 during a City Council meeting on Wednesday. The rail project is expected to move passengers between San Antonio and Austin, and provide a mass transit option to congested vehicle traffic  on Interstate-35.

Texas A&M's Transportation Institute recently ranked I-35 just south of Austin as the worst highway congestion in the state.

The rail is expected to accommodate San Antonio’s growing population, which is expected to grow by 1.1 million people by 2040, according to projections used by the City in its SA Tomorrow planning initiative. The project would create a new mode of transportation for San Antonio and Austin, while also providing rail service to riders who reside in the fast-growing cities along I-35 corridor between the two major metro areas, including San Marcos, New Braunfels, and Schertz.

The briefing, scheduled for City Council's B-Session on Wednesday, was intended to update officeholders on the City's efforts to contribute to the project's planning.

Rendering of a Lone Star Rail (LSTAR) stop in Austin. Courtesy of LSRD.

Rendering of a Lone Star Rail (LSTAR) stop in Austin. Courtesy of LSRD.

“(The stakeholders) weren’t ready today, but it’s just postponed,” City Manager Sheryl Sculley said of the briefing. “We’re all working together.”

The City approved a $500,000 request from LSRD officials in September to be used toward the rail project’s planning. Bexar County Commissioners also approved a $500,000 contribution, but has not yet approved the necessary agreement with LSRD.

County Manager David L. Smith recently wrote a letter to LSRD Interim Executive Director Ross Milloy, noting that he would recommend that the Court renew project funding on a yearly basis, and urged them to represent County goals in the agreement which included “the conveyance of Union Pacific’s rail right-of-way, securing funding for the necessary rail bypass and garnering the support of area partners in funding the operation of rail facilities.”

VIA Metropolitan Transit also is expected to contribute $500,000 to the project, but has not made its contribution official.

“We felt that more time was needed to finalize a recommendation,” Mayor Ivy Taylor said of the stakeholders. City officials expect the briefing with Lone Star Rail to take place during the first quarter of 2016.

The council went on to discuss a recent disparity study, which found the number of City contracts awarded to businesses owned by men far outnumbered the contracts awarded to women-owned and minority-owned businesses.

City and VIA Metropolitan Transit Staff also briefed the council on the Advanced Transportation District (ATD) Tax allocation, and whether those funds could be diverted to VIA.  Councilmember Rey Saldaña (D4)  recently proposed that VIA use the tax to improve the number and speed of buses in San Antonio, citing his previous experiences riding the VIA bus.

Council members agreed that VIA needed more funding to improve public transportation efficiency, but several questioned whether allocating the City's ATD tax, which funds sidewalk projects and traffic stops, would be the best way to accomplish that goal.

"It's not an easy decision," Saldaña said. "This is the first inning of a long, long conversation that we're going to have."

 

*Top image: Council member Rey Saldaña (D5) discusses his his new transportation proposal. Photo by Lea Thompson.

Related Stories:

A&M Study Ranks Worst Traffic Congestion in Texas

Take the City’s Cycling Survey, Then Ride With Caution

Transportation Pieces Take Shape for VIA, Comprehensive Plan

Lone Star Rail Officials Ask VIA Board for $500,000

Rideshare and Lone Star Rail Courting City Council

8 thoughts on “Lone Star Rail Briefing Postponed Until 2016

  1. VIA wants to contribute $500K of taxpayer funds to the rail project while taking money from the Advanced Transportation District (ATD) Tax allocation. If VIA does not have the money to support its desired upgrades, then stop giving money away.

    • At least Dallas, Houston, Austin, Fort Worth and El Paso are attempting to make progress regarding this issue.

      Each of those cities are still fighting battles, one by one – but they don’t have their collective heads buried in the sand like San Antonio does.

  2. Can they do a study on the amount of money from city contracts awarded to Henry Munoz versus everyone else? My guess is that would be more concerning than the man versus woman/minority findings. I get we need to be inclusive, but I would rather have the best person for the job over checking the woman/minority box

  3. My guess is that its the lobbyists for the Mortuary Industry that are keeping commuter rail from moving forward in South/Central TX. With all of the people dying on I-35, just think of all the mortuaries, cemeteries, headstone cutters, flower shops, etc. are being kept busy by I-35’s carnage! I-35 is an economic generator, just not the type of economic generator that everyone realizes.

  4. If a commuter rail recommendation was a priority then it would have found one by now.

    Not trying to be a troll just exhausted of the delays in putting such a project into motion.

  5. “‘We felt that more time was needed to finalize a recommendation,’ Mayor Ivy Taylor said…”

    Yep, that always seems to be what’s needed most of all: more time.

    Anything to increase costs, plant seeds of doubt, encourage gainsayers and delay progress. More time.

    Thank you, Mayor Taylor. When it comes to rail-based passenger transport – of any sort – you’ve never failed to live down to all my expectations.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *