Controversy surrounds monuments like this statue in Travis Park that remembers the Confederate dead. Some believe it should stand; others want it removed. Credit: Don Mathis/San Antonio Report

Thank you from a Borderlander in South Texas to New Orleans Mayor Mitch Landrieu for his efforts to “make straight a wrong turn” by removing four Confederate-era monuments from his city.

I pray that Mayor Landrieu’s speech lives in our hearts, minds, and most importantly, the textbooks of our nation’s schoolchildren for generations to come.

“A great nation does not hide its history. It faces its flaws and corrects them,” said former President George W. Bush at the opening of the National Museum of African American History and Culture in Washington, D.C., less than a year ago.

Facing the legacy of a difficult war like the Civil War, its foundations and its aftermath, from all perspectives is hard work. Landrieu’s speech was surgically precise in exposing the cancer of slavery in the Confederacy. He is correct. The Confederacy was on the wrong side of humanity.

Thank you from the former school-age child in South Texas who I once was. I sang the national anthem while wondering how “Jose” climbed up the flagpole to see “by the stars’ early light.” I felt the swell of connection and pride in being American. My second-grade imagination heard in the patriotic songs a rooting for me to learn my numbers and spelling, because the future had a place just for me in this nation on whose soil I stood.

The sense of knowing my country accepted and took me into account was underscored by President Kennedy’s words, “Ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for your country.”

The roles of family, church, and school are important in a child’s development. My cultural inheritance was rich living on the U.S. border. It was informed by what I learned at the knee of my mother, who was reared in Mexico, the media I watched and listened to, and what I learned from books and in school. In my case, tamales and mariachis marched beside Benjamin Franklin, Paul Bunyan, Tom Sawyer, and Brenda Starr, the female newspaper comic-strip reporter in whom I saw my own star’s guidance to a career in journalism. My parade of pioneers were inventors, makers, and people who ask why.

I admired our founding fathers in the Northeast U.S. and also the settlers of the Americas and Southwest U.S. who came from España, leaving the old world for a chance to farm and prosper. If my ancestors could cross the ocean for a better life, could grow crops and raise cattle with the scant benefit of 17 inches of annual rainfall in the hardscrabble Chihuahuan desert, then I would proudly carry forward in whatever way I could contribute.

Would I become a nun like my teachers? Would I become a public servant in government like JFK? Would I write the great Mexican-American novel? Whatever I decided, I knew from living on the border with Mexico that I had a strong advantage in being a U.S. citizen. With so much effort and belief behind me, I felt encouraged to use my education and explore the opportunities it offered.

I had a wealth of resources in my education and the cultural treasures of my family’s Mexican and American cultures, but there was also another force within me that I had not understood until watching Landrieu’s speech.

My identity as an American was the fourth leg to complete my table of family, faith, and education. I now understand my “luck of the draw” in being born an American whose founders saw a place for me in the peace and prosperity of this country and its future. I finally see the role played by America’s education systems, colleges and universities, health protections, environmental safeguards, banking regulations, anti-monopoly laws, and policies that protect and serve all Americans, including “hyphenated” ones like me.

This inheritance was an invisible hand that rested on my shoulder, pushing and sustaining me to completion of high school and college, successful careers, and engagement in society.

Landrieu’s speech reminds me that the narrative I believed, that I was being lifted and carried by a movement in humanity stronger than race, culture, history, or personal wealth, truly did fuel my life’s journey through difficult times. My father’s union protected our family of five when he was killed in a smelter accident. Social Security provided for our family until we five siblings entered college or the military. There were grants, loans, and scholarships that paid the way for multiple academic degrees for my family including a nursing degree, two doctorates, one brother’s excelling in real estate, and another becoming the state’s second Texas Ranger of Mexican American descent.

What would it feel like to not have the backing of your country and its founders? What would it matter if the lift and support I felt ever-present in my personal story had never been there or been withdrawn?

Living on the border, I knew a little of what that might feel like from first-hand knowledge. The elite and racist old-Europe strain had taken hold in Mexico and on the border where I lived. I saw it in my own family, which favored light skin and male privilege. I saw in in school and in local politics, which were corrupted by power.

Later I experienced racism first-hand in East Texas visiting family, and in Austin where I studied. But as an antidote, I also benefited from Great Society initiatives like my mother’s evening adult education classes, my low-interest college loans and grants, and Federal Communications Commission employment rules that for a brief time opened doors for women and minorities to work in radio and television stations.

Landrieu’s speech prompts me to ask what national narrative would I have, had I been born African American? True, my family, faith, and education might provide the backing for my journey as a young person, but I would most likely lack my fourth leg of support, my sense of being accepted and taken into account as an American.

The removal of monuments of the Confederate era in New Orleans may prove pivotal in rectifying errors in our nation’s history. It’s only one step in a long journey, after all. The only way to know for certain is to wait and to see how the next generation of Americans hailing from diverse backgrounds perceives the country as supporting their humanity and progress, rather than celebrating enslavement and being on the wrong side of humanity.

Linda Cuellar is a retired Northwest Vista College communications professor who has lived in San Antonio since 1980. She enjoys writing memoir and writing and producing videos.

7 replies on “Removal of Confederate Monuments Is a Move in Support of Humanity”

    1. In what way do you disagree? (Genuinely asking, no snark.)

      From where I stand as a white male, I agree with the author that removing these monuments to slave holders and their government allows the descendants of those held as slaves to more fully live their humanity. There are fewer and fewer reminders of this harmful and deadly era of American history in public places of honor, and that is all for the better. We cannot forget that history, but it should be contextualized in schools and museums and the like, not revered in the public square.

      This movement to remove Confederate memorials is part of the bending of the moral universe toward justice that abolitionist and theologian Theodore Parker spoke of before Civil War was even fought, and I firmly believe it is the right thing to do.

  1. “The removal of monuments of the Confederate era in New Orleans may prove pivotal in rectifying errors in our nation’s history.”

    Thank you for the piece, Linda, but I’m not sure you proved your thesis in all that navel-gazing. How does erasure equal rectification? Have we suddenly decided that learning history is not how we avoid making the same mistakes as our predecessors?

    Perhaps monuments are not the way to remind us of the horrors of the Confederacy and the multitude of sins it committed, as monuments imply celebration and veneration. But the idea of “rectifying” history by wiping it away, which you seem to suggest, seems to be equivalent too sweeping the remnants of a broken vase under the rug.

    I also worry about the precedent that historical erasure sets. Yes, the Confederacy is an easy target because we all know slavery is evil, but who determines what facets of history should be “rectified?” This is one of those things that’s all well and good when it’s something you agree with, but given your social justice-themed rhetoric, I’m not sure you want to open the floodgates to this kind of thing when you have Abbott in power.

    1. Mark, would you support building monuments to the enslaved Africans who were brought here against their will? Or monuments to memorialize the lynchings that have happened across the entire country throughout our history? Can we just decide that the statue of the confederate soldier in Travis Park erected 40 years after the South lost the Civil War by the Daughters of the Confederacy is now meant to be a reminder that we as a nation do not want to return to that dark time? That hardly seems to have been the intent when it was built. Wouldn’t that modern day evolution be akin to the very erasure that you decry Ms. Cuellar for advocating?

      These monuments need to be removed to a historical, educational setting where they can be viewed in the context of their time and our time from the perspective of all races and classes.

  2. https://www.theguardian.com/world/video/2013/mar/09/saddam-hussein-statue-toppled-bagdhad-april-2003-video

    Watch as Iraqis topple the statue of their oppressive leader. It was a broadcast around the world as something very positive. I’m sure there were plenty in Iraq that didn’t think it was a positive though.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e3RHAZcTeG8

    Watch as a statue of Hitler is destroyed by Allied troops.

    Does that bother folks here? I’m sure it bothers somebody.

    We don’t need to celebrate oppression and slavery. Take them down.

  3. Thank you Linda. Your words resonate, and I am bookmarking this article to remind me.

  4. Epitaph by Roya Cortissoz

    AS IN THE HEAARTS OF THE PEOPLE
    FOR WHOM HE SAVED THE UNION
    THE MEMORY OF ABRAHAM LINCOLN
    IS ENSHIRNED FOREVER

    A serious study of the war between the states was about saving the union, although, in all wars opposing sides will support what may benefit them.

Comments are closed.