No Action on Fire Union Contract Negotiations One Week After City Dropped Lawsuit

Print Share on LinkedIn Comments More
San Antonio Professional Fire Fighters Association President Chris Steele.

Scott Ball / Rivard Report

San Antonio Professional Firefighters Association President Chris Steele has yet to respond to an invitation from the City to negotiate.

It's been seven days since the City of San Antonio dropped its lawsuit challenging the "evergreen" clause in the firefighters union labor contract. That timeline is significant because union President Chris Steele said in March that if the City drops the lawsuit, "we will be at the table within seven days" to negotiate a new contract.

The City has not received a response from the San Antonio Professional Firefighters Association or its representatives, the City's Government and Public Affairs Director Jeff Coyle told the Rivard Report Thursday.

Last week, City Attorney Andy Segovia sent a letter to union attorney Ricky Poole that formally notified the union that the lawsuit had been dropped. Segovia also asked for him for available dates in December to set up mediation sessions.

Steele and other fire union representatives did not respond to requests for comment on Thursday.

"As mayor, I am extending my hand because we need to negotiate a deal," Mayor Ron Nirenberg said Thursday. "There’s an open seat at the table. The taxpayers and firefighters deserve a fair deal to put the conflict behind us. Our door is still open and I am still ready to negotiate."

Councilman Greg Brockhouse (D6), who has worked for the unions and will likely launch a campaign for mayor in 2019, said Thursday that the fire union needs to start negotiations soon.

"Firefighters union leaders have made it clear that they viewed the city’s lawsuit as the last remaining obstacle before negotiations could begin," Nirenberg said in a statement last week. "We have now removed the obstacle and look forward to putting our conflict behind us and getting a new agreement that is fair to firefighters and taxpayers."

The warring sides have yet to discuss the new contract outside of court-ordered mediation sessions last year that were unsuccessful. The firefighters' contract expired in 2014, but the 10-year evergreen clause allows firefighters to work under its terms without normal wage increases. The City filed two separate lawsuits that challenged the constitutionality of a 10-year clause in both the fire and police union contracts. The lawsuits were cited by both unions as a detriment to "good faith" negotiations, but the City countered that the clauses were the real barrier to talks.

When the police union reached a compromise deal with the City in 2016, the City dropped the suit pertaining to the police union but continued to appeal its request for a summary judgment against the fire union's clause to the Texas Supreme Court. The high court declined to hear the case in June.

Meanwhile, the fire union led the charge to get three city charter amendments approved by voters on the November ballot; a proposition that would have made it easier for citizens to put City Council decisions to a public vote failed, but voters approved limits to future city managers’ salaries and tenure and a measure that gives the union binding arbitration power with the City for a new contract. In order for the fire union to use its voter-approved power to call for non-binding arbitration, negotiations must first begin.

On the same day that the City dropped its lawsuit, City Manager Sheryl Sculley announced her retirement. Officials said the timing was a coincidence, but some have speculated that with Sculley – a longtime target of union criticism – on her way out, negotiations could finally start.

10 thoughts on “No Action on Fire Union Contract Negotiations One Week After City Dropped Lawsuit

  1. I have followed this from the beginning. I have always been behind the Firefighters and families. Right now all eyes are on Chris Steele to see if he will hold up his part of this bargain and stand behind his promise. This is the moment of truth. I hope he heeds his own advice and “comes to the table” If not he should be replaced as Union President because along with that title comes the expectation of integrity and ethical behavior. Make the right decision and don’t make our guys look ridiculous and greedy.

  2. Important part of this article is that contract continues with existing terms With Out a Normal wage increase. Let evergreen clause continue ( with no Granted wage increases ) and then COSA and citizens ( the voters) will PAY for Current Fire Union Health/Pension/Other benefits until Expiration! Will see if this is 66%!!!

  3. Firefighters should be embarrassed that this clown is their representative and the voters need to demand City Council resists this 100% benefits plan. With overtime and special pay many of these guys and gals are pulling down well into the six figures and they want a platinum plated health plan to boot. And the constituents are vexed by what Sculley makes? Further proof that politics and people’s understanding of the issues rarely bear on the reality.

  4. This is not hard to figure. I believe Steele is doing a national search for an arbitrator who will guarantee the SAFD contract meets 100% of the firefighter’s goals.

  5. Craig, that isn’t how arbitration works. Both parties agree upon an arbitrator among several.
    Arbitrators are neutral and decide solely on facts presented. I know as a former union steward who arbitrated several cases.
    Only Chris Steele knows what is going on. Remember Nirenberg is only ready for negotiations because he got his butt kicked on November 6th.

    • Well Pancho, as usual, you are wrong again.
      One provision of the charter amendment that you fools passed is that the Union selects the arbitrator.

    • They’re deciding how to present this best for the benefit of Brockhouse, as the propositions were likely his idea to begin with. Very smart guy. Plan has worked like a charm so far.

  6. union President Chris Steele said in March that if the City drops the lawsuit, “we will be at the table within seven days” to negotiate a new contract.

    Did the City drop the lawsuit in March ? Maybe City Manager and Mayor thought was an evergreen clause attached to President Chris Steele’s statement way back in March 2018. Bottom line is city did not drop the lawsuit in March as SAFD had asked and I’m not so sure they really dropped it in December 2018 – more like they lost the appeal after appeal after appeal.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *