On Failed States and Innovative Cities 

Print Share on LinkedIn Comments More
A new San Antonio River Barge passes over the holiday-covered spotlights along Museum Reach.

Bonnie Arbittier / Rivard Report

A new San Antonio River barge passes over spotlights along the Museum Reach.

In late October, the International City/County Management Association’s annual conference brought me to San Antonio where I saw firsthand the sharp juxtaposition between a failed state and an innovative city.  

Texas represents the rise of state governments that are anti-urban, anti-science, and anti-reason. The recent Texas legislative session was preoccupied with efforts to crack down on sanctuary cities, impede urban annexation, and even preempt local laws that require homeowners to seek approval before cutting down historic trees.

But as the state government reverts to partisan revenge, the City of San Antonio has continued its march forward. I’ve been coming to San Antonio for 25 years since I went to work for Henry Cisneros during his tenure as Secretary of Housing and Urban Development. The city is now 1.5 million strong (7th largest in the U.S.), and nationally recognized for its diversity, diversifying economy, and magnetic appeal.

I went straight from the airport to Henry’s office; he continues to be a source of inspiration and information. He just co-authored a new book, Building Equitable Cities: How to Drive Economic Mobility and Regional Growth, which I highly recommend. After touching base with Henry, I was able to get out into San Antonio and observe how leaders there are building an equitable city – with local efforts driving inclusion, innovation, and infrastructure. 

First, with Henry’s help, I visited with Sarah Baray, the CEO of Pre-K 4 SA, a real thrill since I highlighted this initiative as a national model in a recent paper. In 2012, San Antonio successfully passed Pre-K 4 SA, a measure that raised the citywide sales tax from 8.125 percent to 8.25 percent, to expand access to prekindergarten. The effort was originally led by then-Mayor (and future Secretary of Housing and Urban Development) Julián Castro. It generates approximately $35 million annually, costing the median San Antonio household $7.81 per year.   

Families pick up their children at Pre-K 4 SA on the city's Southside.

Scott Ball / Rivard Report

Families pick up their children at Pre-K 4 SA on the city’s Southside.

The goal of Pre-K 4 SA, in Sarah’s words, is to “change the trajectory of San Antonio in one generation.” By all accounts, it is succeeding. The city has built or renovated four modern pre-K centers to serve 2,000 4-year-olds. Everything about this effort is high-quality: the facilities, the teachers, and the focus on hands-on learning. Sarah and her colleagues have done their homework: they know interventions early in life – such as access to preschool – can reduce the long-term achievement gap and set the platform for children to be middle class by middle age. I witnessed a community with a collective soul, a sharp contrast to the divisive politics of the state government.

Second, I sat down with folks from Geekdom and San Antonio’s Office of Innovation. Geekdom is a 6-year-old co-working space with more than 1,600 members and more than 500 “community companies.” Geekdom calculates that the jobs their companies represent would be San Antonio’s 17th largest employer if they were one unified enterprise. Their goal: to grow 10,000 jobs in San Antonio’s historic downtown, working in close concert with the city government and their focus to use entrepreneurs to find market means to solve social challenges.

Geekdom Stock Image

Bonnie Arbittier / Rivard Report

Members meet in one of several common spaces at Geekdom.

Finally, I took a several-mile walk along the famed River Walk. Originally built in the 1930s, the River Walk was recently expanded. There is something magical and restorative about being in nature in the city. But this smart 80-year-old effort around urban place-making is spawning a growth spurt in museums, mixed-use developments, and amenity districts that hug the river, exemplifying the tight interplay between quality places, innovative economies, and inclusive affects.

San Antonio’s progress amid state hostility reminds us of three central truths. First, cities are not state governments that can be hijacked by partisanship and captured by ideologues. Rather, they are networks of institutions and leaders that are intrinsically pragmatic and focused on problem-solving. 

Second, as a corollary, city power is neither defined by governmental power exclusively nor dependent upon state governments making smart decisions or devolving formal power. Rather, cities have enormous market and civic power, since they concentrate real economic and physical assets as well as problem-solving institutions and people. Even when states get stupid, cities can leverage their market and civic power to fund the future through transformative investments in innovation, infrastructure, and inclusion. A state government’s efforts to preempt a city’s governmental power, in short, does not and cannot preempt smart public, private, and civic action and progress.

Finally, cities are part of a natural cycle of innovation: one city invents, another adapts, routines get set, and the market scales. Pre-K 4 SA has already become a must-visit for other cities thinking about investing in early childhood education. Geekdom is a great model for cities that don’t have Tier 1 research institutions like Carnegie Mellon University in Pittsburgh or Georgia Tech in Atlanta. And the River Walk continues to inspire U.S. and other cities thinking about how river ways and greenways could become a foundation for economic regeneration.

Obviously we would all prefer to have smart states that enable innovation rather than stupid states that micro-manage and impede progress. But it is what it is. Let’s use this age of populism, however long it lasts, to rebuild our nation and society from the bottom up.

San Antonio is pushing the limits and, in the process, making us rethink the relationship between states and cities and reimagine what power is in the 21st century.

 

14 thoughts on “On Failed States and Innovative Cities 

  1. Mr. Katz , in my opinion, leans so left as to not see the center. His connections with Henry Cisneros and Julian Castro pretty much proves that. The state government is not anti-urban nor anti reason. Perhaps Mr. Katz needs to get out of the city and out of his progressive box. He speaks like a true Yankee.

    • https://www.texastribune.org/2017/08/04/lt-gov-dan-patrick-criticizes-city-governments-tv-appearance/

      https://www.texasmonthly.com/burka-blog/dan-patrick-admits-fight-cities-partisan/

      Here is exactly what Dan Patrick said in August on Fox Business Network:
      “People are happy with their governments at the state level. They’re not with their cities. By the way, Stuart, there’s something going on that you really need to focus on. And that is, our cities are still controlled by Democrats. Where do we have all our problems in America? Not at the state level, run by Republicans, but in our cities that are mostly controlled by Democrat mayors and Democrat city councilmen and women. That’s where you see liberal policies, that’s where you see high taxes, where you see high street crimes. Look at New York, look at Chicago, look at…go around the country. So the only place Democrats have control of is our cities and they’re doing a terrible job.”

      Seems pretty anti-urban to me. Hyper-partisan, sure. But I think that this past legislative session would have gone exactly the same even if the mayors of San Antonio, Dallas, Houston, Austin, and El Paso were all Republicans.

    • It’s used as an irony. There is nothing “progressive” about usurping private property rights, or openly breaking federal law.

      And there is certainly nothing “progressive” about “urban annexation”.

  2. I think I want to be known as a citizen of a “progressive”city. I wonder how many cities such as Boston, San Francisco, and New Orleans grew to their prominence by rejecting “progressive” thoughts. Few, if any.

    I know I want to be part of a compassionate city, as San Antonio recently acknowledged. It has, for years, had more people marching in the annual MLK parade, yet ironically having a smaller percentage of blacks than many other cities in the US.

    I am also proud of the city leadership who took our case to Austin last spring to help even our Governor understand why San Antonio must oppose many of the ideas promulgated in Austin.

    I suggest that you who have need to return to the “good old days” move to the country and enjoy the sunsets.

  3. Why couldn’t it have just been an article about the good things going on in San Antonio without attacking the State of Texas? We don’t need this sort of divisive rhetoric just before Christmas. Just look at the comments on this article and how it has brought out the worst in people

  4. Texas is a failed state? LMFAO, I think the author’s progressive use of the word stupid to describe Texas (state government implied) is a case of the pot calling the kettle black. Also, Mr. Katz seems to enjoy using the word partisan, so that’s the word I’ll use to describe this article. If you haven’t actually read the article, then allow me to save you the effort: Evil Republican controlled state government bad, Progressive Democrat city government good.

  5. The concept of state versus city government is an interesting one, but it seems the discussion here misses the point. What Katz is talking about is not where authority should be lodged but rather which political party should have power. And, since his favored party is in control of the city government, he makes the case that city government is where it’s at and the state government is lacking. But that’s nothing more than dogmatic partisanship. It makes one wonder whether his forthcoming book does the same thing.

  6. Typical.

    Sanctuary cities are breaking federal law, and should be cracked down on.

    “Urban annexation” is just a fancy term for “urban sprawl”. Apparently Mr. Katz realizes that most people are against urban sprawl, and for higher density center cities, (which has its problems too). Not everybody wants to live in a condo, enduring the congestion of the center city.

    And of course, like a good liberal, (there is NOTHING progressive about today’s liberals), Mr. Katz hates the fact that the state is trying to preserve the rights of property owners. No, he’d rather bureaucrats telling everyone what to do. If you’re not paying my mortgage, butt out. Trees get old, they get sick, and they die. A rotted tree is a danger as it will eventually fall.

    I do agree with the good things SA is doing, but they are not partisan. Mr. Katz endeavors to widen a divide that just isn’t there.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *