Councilman Ron Nirenberg (left) and Mayor Ivy Taylor (right) will be entering a runoff election to decide the next San Antonio mayor on June 10th.
Mayor Ivy Taylor (left) and Councilman Ron Nirenberg (right) will be entering a runoff election to decide the next San Antonio mayor on June 10th. Credit: Hannah Whisenant and Scott Ball / San Antonio Report

Mayor Ivy Taylor and District 8 Councilman Ron Nirenberg will go head to head in a June 10 runoff, separated Saturday night by less than 5,000 votes and 5 percentage points in the general election and vying now for the nearly 20% of the votes that went to 12 other candidates on the crowded and confusing ballot.

With all ballots counted, Taylor has 41,788 votes, 42.01%, while Nirenberg won 36,887 votes, 37.08%. Voters favored Taylor in the early voting, while Nirenberg drew more votes on Saturday.

Bexar County Democratic Party Chairman Manuel Medina, whose controversial candidacy was self-funded, was a distant third with 15,049 votes, only 15.13%. Eleven other candidates who did not mount active campaigns drew a total of 5.79%.

Few people outside of Nirenbergā€™s campaign predicted he would finish as strongly. One factor may have been Taylorā€™s place on the second page of the electronic ballot.

ā€œThis is the moment we planned for, this is a great victory,ā€ Nirenberg said as he arrived at his campaign headquarters. ā€œThis campaign has been about a message of a bolder vision for San Antonio, strong leadership. ā€¦ We donā€™t need more planning. We need a vision, and we need leadership in the mayorā€™s office, and this is a clear mandate for that change.ā€

Taylor came through the doors of the Wyndham Garden Hotel on the River Walk  hand in hand with daughter Morgan, 13, and husband Rodney. Supporters chanted, ā€œIvy! Ivy!ā€ and ā€œtwo more years.ā€ Councilman Joe Krier (D9), also in attendance, hugged Taylor in support.

ā€œWell, itā€™s definitely hard to predict,ā€ Taylor said. ā€œWith 14 [candidates] on the ballot and with me being on page two, Iā€™m not surprised, but I think weā€™re in a very strong position. ā€¦ Iā€™m ready to continue serving as mayor of San Antonio for two more years. To my supporters, I say come back out on June 10 and letā€™s do it again and finish this up.ā€

In a city with nearly 1 million registered voters, only 77,579 voters went to the polls during the early voting period, which ended Tuesday. Far fewer voters, less than 40,000, turned out Saturday on Election Day. (See unofficial Bexar County returns below.) As more and more people choose to vote early, Election Day polls are drawing smaller and smaller percentages of the vote total ā€“ less than 30% this election. Yet poll workers staffed 565 city precincts.

In the end, the final vote count reflected less than a 12% turnout of the cityā€™s registered voters.

Voters overwhelmingly approved the cityā€™s record $850 million bond, with all six propositions passing by margins ranging from 67%-79% of voters in favor of the plan. Voters living in the Alamo Colleges districts also voted overwhelmingly to approve the $450 million bond.

Voters were less kind to City Council incumbents.

In District 7, challenger Ana Sandoval stunned incumbent Cris Medina. Sandoval finished with 50.79% of the vote to Medinaā€™s 36.29%. Three other candidates were on the ballot.

Ana Sandoval cheers when she rises above 50% of the vote at Deco Pizzeria during the election.
Ana Sandoval cheers when she rises above 50% of the vote at Deco Pizzeria during the election. Credit: Bonnie Arbittier / San Antonio Report

District 1 Councilman Roberto TreviƱo finished with 48.76% of the vote, not enough to win outright over his main challenger, Michael MontaƱo, who won 31.45%. Four other candidates accounted for the other 20%.

District 2 City Councilman Alan Warrick also will be in a runoff, winning only 40.86% of the vote while his main challenger, William ā€œCruzā€ Shaw, finished second with 28.64%. Keith Toney, who was appointed to the council seat when Taylor first became mayor in July 2014 and then lost in the 2015 election to Warrick, finished third with 23.40%.

District 3 Councilwoman Rebecca Viagran sailed to an easy re-election with 62% of the vote against six challengers. District 4 Councilman Rey SaldaƱa won 78.36% of the vote against two challengers. District 5 Councilwoman Shirley Gonzales won 65.78% of the vote against five challengers.

Districts 6, 8, 9, and 10 will all see new members elected to City Council with the four incumbents stepping down. All four races are headed for runoffs.

In District 6, Greg Brockhouse won 36.09% while Melissa Cabello Havrda won 20.57% to get into the runoff by nosing out Ricardo ā€œRickā€ TreviƱo by 28 votes, who finished at 20.24% of the vote. Four other candidates were on the ballot.

In District 8, Cynthia Brehm finished first with 33.38% of the vote over Manny Pelaez with 27.26%. Four other candidates were on the ballot.

In District 9, Marco Barros won 24.68% of votes cast, and John Courage was second with 22.40%. Eight other candidates were on the ballot.

In District 10, Ezra Johnson and Clayton Perry finished neck-and-neck to make it into a runoff. Johnson received 2,733 votes ā€“ 18 ahead of Perry with 21.55%. Eight other candidates were on the ballot.

City Council elections seldom generate such drama. One incumbent was unseated Saturday. Two others incumbents were forced into runoffs, and runoffs in four vacant council districts means that at least five of the 10 council members taking office will be new.

But it was the tighter-than-expected mayorā€™s race that will generate the most political buzz and speculation in the days that follow. Some political watchers said in advance of Saturday that  Taylor might win outright in the general election or might be forced into a runoff by Nirenberg, with neither outcome being a surprise in an age where people distrust polls and their own political instincts.

Yet everyone seemed surprised by the strength of Nirenbergā€™s performance.

Taylor, Nirenberg, and Medina were the three candidates with visible organizations, campaigns, and the funding to reach eligible voters. Yet Taylor supporters had to scroll through two screens of candidates to even find her name on the electronic ballot. She was listed 12th out of 14 candidates, while Nirenberg was in the fifth position and Medina in the eighth position. The two principal challengers both appeared on the first screen of names.

Ballot placement was determined by a drawing at City Hall, allowing candidates who did nothing more than pay the $75 processing fee to draw a low number and secure a high place on the ballot.

Taylor was first elected in 2009 to City Council as the District 2 representative on the cityā€™s Eastside, a traditionally black stronghold that is now majority Hispanic. She was re-elected in 2011 and 2013. When then-Mayor JuliĆ”n Castro was tapped by President Obama to become Secretary of Housing & Urban Development, Taylor was elected by her fellow city council members to serve out Castroā€™s unexpired term.

Taylor took office in July 2014 with the promise that she would not seek a full term as mayor, but she changed her mind and voters supported her run by electing her in a June 2015 runoff election with former State Sen. Leticia Van de Putte.

Taylor became San Antonioā€™s first elected black mayor, and only the second woman after Lila Cockrell ( 1975-83 and 1989-91) to win the office. Taylor also is the first black mayor in a city with more than 1 million people.

Nirenberg was first elected to represent District 8 on City Council in 2013 and re-elected in 2015. He would have been eligible to serve two more two-years terms, but gave up his seat to challenge Taylor.

This was Medinaā€™s first run for political office in Texas, but his official biography omits a previous unsuccessful run for office in Mexico that was first reported by the San Antonio Express-News, which also documented a decade-long stretch when Medina, a Mexican native and naturalized U.S.  citizen, appeared to live and work in Mexico. Medina disputes the newspaperā€™s reports, but questions about the veracity of his official biography and allegations of financial mismanagement of party funds became significant issues that dogged him through the campaign.

Mayoral candidate Manuel Medina passes outside his campaign headquarters after receiving only 15.13% of the vote.
Mayoral candidate Manuel Medina leaves his campaign headquarters after receiving only 15.13% of the vote. Credit: Scott Ball / San Antonio Report

Most prominent Latino Democrats in San Antonio have been conspicuously absent from the Medina campaign, which was largely self-funded by the political consultant and Dominion resident.

Medina was gracious in defeat Saturday evening.

ā€œWe said we needed a mayor who was independent of special interests. I believed that then, and I believe it today,ā€ he said. ā€œWe said we needed a mayor who focused on today. I believed that then and I believe it today.ā€

Medina said he would continue to fight against the role that special interests play in local government. He also said that longstanding issues of intergenerational poverty on the Westside, Eastside violence, Northside traffic gridlock, and lack of Southside infrastructure must be addressed.

ā€œWe didnā€™t win today, but our issues won today,ā€ Medina added.

He congratulated Taylor and Nirenberg, but declined to make an endorsement.

ā€œI want to thank them for their hard work, for the issues they talked about, and the hard fight and the long days and nights they gave because they love their city, too,ā€ he added.

The Bexar County results below are based on 100% of all precincts counted.

Robert Rivard, co-founder of the San Antonio Report who retired in 2022, has been a working journalist for 46 years. He is the host of the bigcitysmalltown podcast.

6 replies on “Taylor to Face Nirenberg in June 10 Runoff”

  1. Lots of research on ballot listing. Link below. Interesting topic. Doubtful it was an issue here, especially considering the low-turnout. Point 8 in the link would favor Nirenberg, but others would favor Taylor. It seems to be a wash. Considering that the turn-out was so low, voters who did vote were highly motivated and no doubt had their candidate clearly in mind. I’m sure ballot listing was a non-issue.

    She appears very untrustworthy and doesn’t present well at all. Not a strong candidate. Tepid mayor, at best, made to look passable by a scorching hot economy in an up-and-coming city. That Nirenberg guy looks like the real deal: strong, honest vision. That’s my hot take.

    Decent little blog you have here. Thanks. Keep it up.

    Ballot listing link: http://www.centerforpolitics.org/newslet_909cb.html

    1. Thanks for providing this ballot analysis by the University of Virginia’s Larry Sabato, a highly respected expert on the subject of elections and politics. I think you meant to highlight Point 9, which I am sure is valid. What Sabato does not address, however, is how the ballot is presented to voters. A crowded ballot with an uninterrupted list of all candidates might give equal weight to the first and last candidates, but what about an interrupted ballot where voters have to go to a second electronic screen to see all candidates?

      Add to that the user experience. The voting screens do not respond to touch the way a smart phone screen works. The voter has to hold a finger on the screen longer to get the selection to register, which might explain some of the undercount. And surely some of the less informed voters saw 11 names for mayor on the first screen and assumed those were the choices. They voted and then went to the next screen and probably were met with momentary confusion. Many, perhaps, scrolled back to undo their vote, some with the help of a poll worker. But it’s easy to see how some failed to correct their vote or simply gave up. Nearly 1,000 people in the city who voted did not vote for mayor. I find that odd. –RR

  2. Yeah, the user experience was awful. I’ll second that. I read Taylor’s comments as an admission of under-performance and then a reason for that under performance. Was ballot placement the reason 58% didn’t vote for her? Personally, I don’t think so and even going down an endless rabbit hole of scenarios doesn’t change that. We’ll see, though. You media folks got yourselves a race, that’s for sure.

  3. Where I voted early, the election staff verbally informed voters that there were two pages of mayoral candidates. Nirenburgn was not even listed on the ballot/machine where my Husband cast his early vote. Taylor should put on her big girl panties and stop whining.

  4. You might want to correct the runoff candidates for place 6 in the list/table: Havrda – not TreviƱo – came in second.

  5. Yes, went to he study posted-interesting. I guess number of candidates that are on ballot can be an issue. Should we consider City Charter amendment to address “viable ” candidates on ballot?
    Any way, glad to see some else recognized the under votes, District 8 ( my council district) had the highest number of under votes. Hopefully, this bodes well for Candidate Brehm. I determined my selection by attending debate forums and observing which candidate demonstrated traits that indicate capability to work well in a small group.
    Lastly, I hope Cabello-Havrda is elected. I attended candidate debate at Luby’s and one stated “Union Man” and other enjoyed reading.

Comments are closed.