Councilman Roberto Treviño (D1) speaks with Rivard Report Director Robert Rivard at Conversations with the Council at Trinity University.
Councilman Roberto Treviño (D1) speaks with Rivard Report Publisher Robert Rivard at Conversations with the Council at Trinity University. Credit: Bonnie Arbittier / San Antonio Report

Urban sprawl, affordable housing, and sidewalks were among the top issues that City Councilman Roberto Treviño (D1) emphasized Tuesday during the Rivard Report‘s final edition of “Conversations with the Council.”

Robert Rivard, publisher of the Rivard Report, spoke with Treviño in front of more than 50 people, including several students, at Trinity University’s Chapman Auditorium.

Balancing home ownership with multi-family residential options, and addressing gentrification and rising home valuations in the center city received the bulk of the night’s attention.

Treviño said implementation of the SA Tomorrow comprehensive plan will make a big impact on how San Antonio develops over the next few decades. But a successful implementation will rely greatly on how the City interacts with partnering government entities, such as the Bexar County Appraisal District.

“We need to be conscious of how the City does property taxes,” he said of the City’s authority over a portion of total property tax rates.

There are ongoing discussions on how best to address increasing appraisal values through BCAD, Treviño said, but because the City has no authority over the appraisal district, it would have to look to the Texas Legislature for some kind of remedy.

He added that fast-rising appraisals can affect what level of private-sector investment goes into a particular part of town, such as more high-end residential development.

“We’ve got to be smarter about planning, and planning requires collaboration,” he said.

Rivard brought up gentrification, and how some residents may feel pushed out of their neighborhood because of rising appraisals or area development that may spur increased rents in multi-family properties.

Treviño said homeowners age 65 and older can take advantage of a homestead exemption, or freeze on all local taxes. The problem is that many eligible people are unaware that they must apply for the exemption – one of many issues in the realm of property tax rights on which the councilman has been trying to educate his constituents.

“There’s a large percentage of people who haven’t taken advantage of the over-65 exemption,” he said, adding that his district office provides information via email and traditional mail about the appraisal process and tools helpful to taxpayers.

(From left) Rivard Report Director Robert Rivard speaks with Councilman Roberto Treviño (D1) at Conversations with the Council at Trinity University.
Rivard Report Publisher Robert Rivard (left) speaks with Councilman Roberto Treviño (D1) at Conversations with the Council at Trinity University. Credit: Bonnie Arbittier / San Antonio Report

Where homeowners have some avenues to reduce their taxes, renters’ fates lie in the hands of their property owners, Treviño said. He said he encourages home ownership wherever possible, but understands that it is not realistic for many.

In that case, a balance between affordable home ownership and rental opportunities is vital to maintaining the character of existing center city neighborhoods, Treviño said.

“We don’t want it to be 80 percent rental and 20 percent home ownership,” Treviño explained. “That tends to shift the balance in favor of high property taxes.”

Treviño said local government has a few tools, such as San Antonio Housing Trust Fund and Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone (TIRZ) monies, available to encourage the development of affordable housing.

“We have a lot of flexibility with different funding sources, but we’re going to keep looking to see what else can provide that flexibility,” he added. “That’s what we want as a city because different parts of the city are facing different stressors or issues.”

Treviño said encouraging the development of affordable housing is a complex issue because stakeholders must consider a variety of factors such as land values, scale of and materials used for potential buildings, and the local government’s role.

“Our [city] codes – do they encourage that? Probably not,” he said. “That’s why I want codes that are performance-based so that it allow for more incredible designs and innovation that we may not have thought about. We may see materials in a new way.”

An audience member asked about sidewalks and whether the City will be able to develop more sidewalks and better connect them to the Howard Peak Greenway Trails system that’s growing citywide. Treviño recently called for accelerating how the City funds, builds, and repairs sidewalks.

“It’s really quite amazing to see it come together,” Treviño said of the system. He added that more trails and sidewalks increase safety for pedestrians, and promote exercise and decreased use of cars, with the latter meaning fewer exhaust emissions.

“It’s certainly a good investment and I’ll continue to support it,” he said.

Treviño spoke critically of the San Antonio Professional Firefighters Association’s petition drive that proposes caps on City Manager Sheryl Sculley’s salary and tenure, forcing contract negotiations, and reducing requirements for citizens to put proposed ordinances to a public vote.

If the firefighters union were to succeed, Treviño said, it would put questionable or controversial ordinances to a public vote and, thus, adversely affect the ability of City leaders and staff to consider those issues in a thoughtful manner.

“It’s really meant to confuse people, and that’s really unfortunate,” Treviño said of the “San Antonio First” campaign. “One of the things we talk about in my [district] office is [how] we can best [inform] the community on the work we do – to translate or interpret some of the information.”

Another attendee asked about the plan to reimagine Alamo Plaza. Treviño said stakeholders will spend the next few months in meetings and fleshing out the next phase of redevelopment.

“Stay tuned, we’re very excited,” Treviño said, calling Alamo Plaza one of the city’s most significant projects in many regards.

“The work that’s being done is very considerate of things like trees, the heat that’s generated in our city, the interpretation of elements like glass walls, which is not part of the master plan adoption,” Treviño said. “What I think is going to occur is something the community feels they’ve been part of it as well.”

Edmond Ortiz, a lifelong San Antonian, is a freelance reporter/editor who has worked with the San Antonio Express-News and Prime Time Newspapers.

2 replies on “Treviño Talks Smart Growth, Taxes, Housing in ‘Conversation’”

  1. Trevino seems to be heavily focused on property taxes as a reason for gentrification and halting new development – he needs to be aware of recent data and research on this – it shows that property taxes do not increase displacement…and, renters are at greater risk for displacement than homeowners when it comes to property taxes and values, not vice versa
    https://www.citylab.com/equity/2017/01/gentrification-hurts-renters-more-than-homeowners/510074/
    “there is limited evidence that property taxes can displace homeowners. This occurs only among homeowners where property taxes eat up an extraordinarily high fraction of their incomes. The effect of property taxes is essentially the same in gentrifying and non-gentrifying neighborhoods. Furthermore, they find no evidence that state-level property tax policy has any effect on homeowners being displaced from gentrifying neighborhoods at all.”

  2. I don’t agree. I read that City Lab article and I have some issues with it. First, I don’t think using New York City as a baseline is suitable when addressing gentrification in San Antonio. New York is a city of renters (https://www.citylab.com/equity/2015/06/new-york-is-a-city-of-renters-at-every-age-level/396509/). Which means that the number of homeowners displaced by gentrification is already skewed as it’s lower to start with. Now if this study was done with a city like Atlanta, Phoenix, or even New Orleans in mind, then the data would be more appropriate. Second, I agree that renters are 2x more likely to be affected by gentrification, but that doesn’t mean that we can just negate the effect that gentrification has on homeowners. True, a homeowner may have equity but that is not always the case. Unless a house is paid off, the homeowner still has a mortgage. Just as rent changes as property values in a neighborhood goes up, mortgages rise with rising property taxes.

    I and many in my neighborhood of Highland Park; can speak from experience about the effect of property tax increases on our mortgages. And I’m sure that low income people who still have significant mortgage balances due on their homes in Dignowity, Lavaca, and Denver Heights, have seen their bills increase significantly as well. If gentrification didn’t displace homeowners, you wouldn’t have a large number of homeowners afraid of losing their homes.

    I don’t want to downplay the effect that gentrification has on renters but I also don’t want people thinking that homeowners don’t bear some of the brunt as well. It would be more accurate to state that low-income homeowners with a significant mortgage obligation are just as at risk of displacement as renters.

Comments are closed.